NYS Tax Department Relaxes Its Residence Rule

New York State had treated a person who is not domiciled but maintains a “permanent place of abode” for more than 183 days in a taxable year as a resident for income tax purpose. The state tax department had interpreted permanent place of abode as a house or apartment that is capable of being used as a residence even though the person does not actually use it so.

The highest court of New York recently held that in order for a house to be treated as a permanent place of abode for income tax purpose, the person must use the house as his residence. Following the Court of Appeals’ decision, the state tax department changed its ‘statutory residence rule’ and decided that only a place that was in fact used by the taxpayer as a principal residence could constitute a “permanent place of abode” within the meaning of the statute.

See NYS Tax Department Reverses Position on Statutory Residence Rule, Peter Faber, jdsupra.com

Posted by Jin Keol Park, Associate Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s