Hohman et al v. Eadie et al, No. 2:16-cv-11429: No Damages for John Doe Summons

In Hohman v. Eadie, No. 2:16-cv-11429, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan dismissed claims filed by individuals and entities against the government seeking damages for the government’s alleged violation of the Right to Financial Privacy Act by the IRS’s issuance of John Doe summonses for their financial information without prior court approval. The basis for the dismissal was a lack of jurisdiction.

See case (Pacer subscription required) by clicking here.

Posted by Lewis J. Saret, Co-General Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s