Estateography: Irving v. DiVito: Clear Wishes, but Not A Codicil

On her blog, Estateography, Alvi Aggarwal, summarizes Irving v. DiVito, in which the Virginia Supreme Court determined the circuit court did not err in refusing to admit to probate a writing offered as a holographic codicil.

Ms. Aggarwal’s summary of Irving v. DiVito begins as follows:

The writing at issue in Irving is clear about the intended dispositive outcome—to disinherit someone. But the question at the core of this case is whether the testator intended the writing to have testamentary effect, i.e., whether it is authentic. The circuit and Virginia Supreme courts determined the writing was not intended as a codicil.

See full summary by clicking here.

Posted by Lewis J. Saret, Co-General Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s