Jeffrey A. Galant & Dana L. Mark: CRI-Leslie: Musings on Plain Meaning, Absurdity and Capital Gain

Jeffrey A. Galant, Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLP and Dana L. Mark, Kaye Scholer, LLP, have made available for download their article, CRI-Leslie: Musings on Plain Meaning, Absurdity and Capital Gain.  The Abstract is as follows:

CRI-Leslie, LLC v Commissioner is a noteworthy case of first impression involving the interpretation of Internal Revenue Code Section 1234A. In CRI-Leslie the U.S. Tax Court and the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held against capital gain treatment for proceeds received as a result of the cancellation of a contract involving the sale of property. However, the greater importance of these decisions may be the illustration of the methodology used by the courts to interpret the Internal Revenue Code. Or, more to the point, whether the courts were justified in relying on the plain meaning rule rather than the legislative history in determining what Internal Revenue Code Section 1234A means.

Click here to Download This Paper

Posted by Lewis J. Saret, Co-General Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s