Trust Parties’ Uniquely Easy Access to Rescission: Analysis, Critique And Reform by Adam S. Hofri-Winogradow and Gadi Weiss (Nov. 27, 2019)

Adam S. Hofri-Winogradow and Gadi Weiss have made their paper, Trust Parties’ Uniquely Easy Access to Rescission: Analysis, Critique And Reform, available for download. This article was published as a part of the Modern Law Review. The abstract of this article, available on SSRN, reads as follows:

This article shows that parties to trusts currently enjoy easier access to judicial avoidance of voluntary dispositions resulting from mistakes and inadequate decision-making than other persons. The principal doctrinal basis for this advantage has shifted from the rule in Re Hastings-Bass to rescission in equity. We show this advantage to be normatively unjustified, and recommend a uniform legal framework to govern the avoidance of voluntary dispositions resulting from mistakes or inadequate decision-making, whether or not a trust was involved. Under this framework, dispositions resulting from laypersons’ mistakes and inadequate decision-making should be avoided, subject to appropriate defences, whenever that causative nexus is present, while dispositions resulting from professionals’ mistakes and inadequate decision-making should only be avoided where the mistake or deliberative flaw was so serious as to render the transferee’s retention of property transferred unjust.

To see full article, click Trust Parties’ Uniquely Easy Access to Rescission: Analysis, Critique And Reform.

Posted by Katie Thompson, Assistant Editor of the Wealth Strategies Journal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s