Nancy A. McLaughlin, of University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law, has made available for download her article, “Conservation Easements and the Proceeds Regulation,” published in 56 Real Prop. Tr. & Est. L.J. 1 (2021), Forthcoming. The abstract is as followed:
This article provides an in-depth look at Treasury Regulation § 1.170A-14(g)(6)(ii), known as the proceeds regulation. The proceeds regulation is intended to protect the public investment in conservation if a perpetual conservation easement that was the subject of a charitable deduction under Internal Revenue Code § 170(h) is later extinguished. A proper understanding of the proceeds regulation is critical because the public investment in deductible easements is significant—billions of dollars are being invested in such easements annually—and the regulation has recently been subject to challenges regarding its interpretation and validity. This article examines the history and operation of the proceeds regulation as well as possible alternatives. It explains that the proceeds regulation provides a simple and easy-to-implement rule that avoids a host of future valuation difficulties. It demonstrates that the proceeds regulation is neither irrational nor inherently unfair to donors or subsequent property owners, and serves to temper the perverse incentive that property owners may have to seek to extinguish easements. This article concludes that the proceeds regulation provides a reasonable solution to the difficult problem of ensuring that the conservation purpose of a contribution will be protected in perpetuity as required by § 170(h)(5)(A).
To see the full article, click: “Conservation Easements and the Proceeds Regulation” by Nancy A. McLaughlin.
Posted by Bella Hoang, Managing Associate Editor, Wealth Strategies Journal.